The following are some of the misconceptions about islam
Islam is a religion only for Arabs
Muslims worship Muhammad
Muhammad wrote the Quran
Women in Islam
If you want to discover the truth , you may kindly visit:
http://en.wathakker.net/matwyat/view.php?id=375

2

(49 replies, posted in Politics & Economics)

jamesd74 wrote:
alun wrote:

Please be warned, do not click on any  links from this religous fanatic, there is a better than good chance they are riddled with virus's and spyware,  default/mad

In my opinion this idiot should be blocked, as they are obviously and blatantly trying to interfere and recruit,,

Amen to that.

Gehad brother.

I don't understand your anger, you are free to read or ignore whatever you want but you have no right to lie to prevent the others from reading something you dislike .
we live in an open world now. everyone is free to decide whatever he likes or dislikes..

Be fair

3

(49 replies, posted in Politics & Economics)

The pillars of Islam
We hope that you can explain the pillars of Islam for us
Islam is based on five pillars which the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has explained for us
Read about the five pillars of Islam :
http://en.wathakker.net/articles/view.php?id=410
»

I am an American woman who was born in the midst of America’s “Heartland”. I grew up, just like any other girl, being fixated with the glamour of life in “the big city”. Eventually, I moved to Florida and on to South Beach of Miami, a hotspot for those seeking the “glamorous life”. Naturally, I did what most average Western girls do. I focused on my appearance and appeal, basing my self-worth on how much attention I got from others. I worked out rigorously and became a personal trainer, acquired an upscale waterfront residence, became a regular “exhibiting” beach-goer and was able to attain a “living-in-style” kind of life.

Years went by, only to realize that my scale of self-fulfillment and happiness slid down the more I progressed in my “feminine appeal”. I was a slave to fashion. I was a hostage to my looks.

As the gap continued to progressively widen between my self-fulfillment and lifestyle, I sought refuge in escapes from alcohol and parties to meditation, activism, and alternative religions, only to have the little gap widen to what seemed like a valley. I eventually realized it all was merely a pain killer rather than an effective remedy.

As a feminist libertarian, and an activist who was pursuing a better world for all, my path crossed with that of another activist who was already at the lead of indiscriminately furthering causes of reform and justice for all. I joined in the ongoing campaigns of my new mentor which included, at the time, election reform and civil rights, among others. Now my new activism was fundamentally different. Instead of “selectively” advocating justice only to some, I learned that ideals such as justice, freedom, and respect are meant to be and are essentially universal, and that own good and common good are not in conflict. For the first time, I knew what “all people are created equal” really meant. But most importantly, I learned that it only takes faith to see the world as one and to see the unity in creation.

One day I came across a book that is negatively stereotyped in the West--The Holy Quran. Up until that point, all I had associated with Islam was women covered in “tents”, wife beaters, harems, and a world of terrorism. I was first attracted by the style and approach of the Quran, and then intrigued by its outlook on existence, life, creation, and the relationship between Creator and creation. I found the Quran to be a very insightful address to heart and soul without the need for an interpreter or pastor.

Eventually I hit a moment of truth: my new-found self-fulfilling activism was nothing more than merely embracing a faith called Islam where I could live in peace as a “functional” Muslim.

I bought a beautiful long gown and head cover resembling the Muslim woman’s dress code and I walked down the same streets and neighborhoods where only days earlier I had walked in my shorts, bikini, or “elegant” western business attire. Although the people, the faces, and the shops were all the same, one thing was remarkably distinct: the peace at being a woman I experienced for the very first time. I felt as if the chains had been broken and I was finally free. I was delighted with the new looks of wonder on people’s faces in place of the looks of a hunter watching his prey I had once sought. Suddenly a weight had been lifted off my shoulders. I no longer spent all my time consumed with shopping, makeup, getting my hair done, and working out. Finally, I was free.

Of all places, I found my Islam at the heart of what some call “the most scandalous place on earth”, which makes it all the more dear and special.

Soon enough, news started breaking about politicians, Vatican clergymen, libertarians, and so-called human rights and freedom activists condemning the Hijab (headscarf) as being oppressive to women, an obstacle to social integration, and more recently, as an Egyptian official called it -“a sign of backwardness.”

I find it to be a blatant hypocrisy when some people and so-called human rights groups rush to defend women’s rights when some governments impose a certain dress code on women, yet such “freedom fighters” look the other way when women are being deprived of their rights, work, and education just because they choose to exercise their right to wear the Hijab.

Today I am still a feminist, but a Muslim feminist, who calls on Muslim women to assume their responsibilities in providing all the support they can for their husbands to be good Muslims. To raise their children as upright Muslims so they may be beacons of light for all humanity once again. To enjoin good -any good - and to forbid evil -any evil. To speak righteousness and to speak up against all ills. To fight for our right to wear Hijab and to please our Creator whichever way we chose. But just as importantly to carry our experience with Hijab to fellow women who may never have had the chance to understand what wearing Hijab means to us and why do we, so dearly, embrace it.

Willingly or unwillingly, women are bombarded with styles of “dressing-in-little-to-nothing” virtually in every means of communication everywhere in the world. As an ex Non-Muslim, I insist on women’s right to equally know about Hijab, its virtues, and the peace and happiness it brings to a woman’s life as it did to mine. Yesterday, the bikini was the symbol of my liberty, when in actuality it only liberated me from my spirituality and true value as a respectable human being.

I couldn’t be happier to shed my bikini in South Beach and the “glamorous” Western lifestyle to live in peace with my Creator and enjoy living among fellow humans as a worthy person.

Today, Hijab is the new symbol of woman’s liberation to find who she is, what her purpose is, and the type of relation she chooses to have with her Creator.

To women who surrender to the ugly stereotype against the Islamic modesty of Hijab, I say: You don’t know what you are missing.

Amongst the multitude of religions, ideologies and philosophies, only one can claim to follow the preserved revelation of the almighty God. This is an inspiring account of one man's search for the true meaning of life, and how he chose Islam at the end of his journey. Another insight into why Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world.
listen to the story :
http://en.wathakker.net/lib_audio/view.php?id=353

6

(7 replies, posted in Politics & Economics)

all the people are brothers in humanity . all of them were born of the same father and mother, but we forget that.

not only the preachers who should think to find the truth and then tell us what we should do and believe, but also we have minds and we are sane enough to decide ,am I right

everyone is free to choose his beliefs, otherwise how can he be resposable for his choice before his God . if I have a chance to have a good friend I will take it even if his beliefs were not as mine.

How many 'Sons' does God have?

Many people tell us "but the Bible clearly says that Jesus is the Son of God. How can you say that Jesus is not God's only begotten son when Jesus says it so clearly in black and white in the Bible?" Well, first of all, we need to know the language of his people, the language of the Jews to whom he was speaking. Let us see how they understood this proclamation.

Let us begin by asking: How many sons does the Bible tell us that God Almighty has?

Jacob is God's son and firstborn: "Israel is my son, even my firstborn" [Exodus 4:22]

Solomon is God's son "He shall build an house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son": 2 [Samuel 7:13-14]

Ephraim is God's firstborn: "for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn" [Jeremiah 31:9] (who is God's firstborn? Israel or Ephraim?).

Adam is the son of God "Adam, which was the son of God" [Luke 3:38].

Common people (you and me) are the sons of God:
"Ye are the children of the LORD your God" [Deuteronomy 14:1].
"For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God" [Romans 8:14].
"But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name" [John 1:12].
"That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;" [Philippians 2:15].
"Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: ... now are we the sons of God" 1 [John 3:1-2].
"When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" [Job 38:7].
"Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD" [Job 2:1].
"Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD" [Job 1:6].
"when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men," [Genesis 6:4].
"That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair" [Genesis 6:2].

As we can see, the use of the term "son of God" when describing normal human beings was not at all an uncommon practice among Jesus' people.

Well then, was Jesus the only begotten son of God?

Read Psalms 2:7 : "I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me (King David, King), Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee"

Indeed, the Jews are even referred to as much more than this in the Bible, and this is indeed the very trait which Jesus (pbuh) held against them. When the Jews picked up stones to stone Jesus (pbuh) he defended himself with the following words
"Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, 'I said, Ye are gods?' If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken..." [John 10:34]

(he was referring to Psalms 82:6 "I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High..") As we can see from these and many other verses like them, "son of God" in the language of the Jews was a very innocent term used to describe a loyal servant of God. Whether the translators and editors chose to write it as "Son of God" (with a capital S) in reference to Jesus and "son of God" (with a small S) in reference to everyone else does not diminish the fact that in the original language, both cases are exactly the same. Are we beginning to see what drove the most learned men of the Anglican Church to recognize the truth? But let us move on.

Grolier's encyclopedia, under the heading "Jesus Christ," says:
"During his earthly life Jesus was addressed as rabbi and was regarded as a prophet. Some of his words, too, place him in the category of sage. A title of respect for a rabbi would be "my Lord." Already before Easter his followers, impressed by his authority, would mean something more than usual when they addressed him as "my Lord.".... it is unlikely that the title "Son of David" was ascribed to him or accepted by him during his earthly ministry. "Son of God," in former times a title of the Hebrew kings (Psalms 2:7), was first adopted in the post-Easter church as an equivalent of Messiah and had no metaphysical connotations (Romans 1:4). Jesus was conscious of a unique filial relationship with God, but it is uncertain whether the Father/Son language (Mark 18:32; Matt. 11:25-27 par.; John passim) goes back to Jesus himself" .

There seems to be only two places in the Bible where Jesus (pbuh) refers to himself as "son of God." They are in John chapters 5 and 11. Hastings in "The dictionary of the Bible" says: "Whether Jesus used it of himself is doubtful." Regardless, we have already seen what is meant by this innocent title. However, Jesus is referred to as the "son of Man" (literally: "Human being") 81 times in the books of the Bible. In the Gospel of Barnabas, we are told that Jesus (pbuh) knew that mankind would make him a god after his departure and severely cautioned his followers from having anything to do with such people.

Jesus was not the son of a human man (according to both the Bible and the Qur'an). However, we find him constantly saying "I am the son of man." Why?. It was because in the language of the Jews, that is how you say "I am a human being."

What was he trying to tell us by constantly repeating and emphasizing to us throughout the New Testament "I am a human being," "I am a human being," "I am a human being"?. What had he foreseen? Think about it!.

Do Christians emphasize this aspect of Jesus? The New Testament Greek word translated as "son" are "pias" and "paida" which mean "servant," or "son in the sense of servant." These are translated to "son" in reference to Jesus and "servant" in reference to all others in some translations of the Bible (see below). As we are beginning to see, one of the most fundamental reasons why Jesus (pbuh) is considered God is due to extensive mistranslation. We shall see more and more examples of this throughout this book.

Islam teaches that Jesus (pbuh) was a human being, not a God. Jesus (peace be upon him) continually emphasized this to his followers throughout his mission. The Gospel of Barnabas also affirms this fact. Once again, Grolier's encyclopedia says:

"...Most problematical of all is the title "Son of Man." This is the only title used repeatedly by Jesus as a self-designation, and there is no clear evidence that it was used as a title of majesty by the post-Easter church. Hence it is held by many to be authentic, since it passes the criterion of dissimilarity

10

(7 replies, posted in Politics & Economics)

Have You Heard ?
Don't forget that you have  brothers all over the world ... have you heard about them ?
Know more about them :

http://en.wathakker.net/flashes/view.php?id=101

I'm just giving some answers , are you afraid to think or use your mind to decide where is the truth ?

12

(13 replies, posted in Everything Else)

Muhammad in the Bible
Muhammad in the Bible

Could he be the "Paraklytos"?

By: Yusuf Estes (Former Christian Preacher)
Read about this :
http://en.wathakker.net/articles/view.php?id=117

Answers to 7 Questions on Islam
    ….    What is Islam?.... Who are Muslims?.......... Who is Allaah?
Who is Muhammad?.... What are the Teachings of Islam?.... What is the Qur'an?
http://en.wathakker.net/articles/view.php?id=527

14

(2 replies, posted in Politics & Economics)

we hope that the war in Iraq comes to an end soon

15

(3 replies, posted in Introduce yourself)

hi, I'm a new member in your community and I'm pleased to join your world.
my name is Mohammad
my job is a translator
I live in Kuwait
and that is all
can you hear me, if you do send me a message!!!!!!!