526

(15 replies, posted in Announcements)

Hi Sean

I am sorry that you feel this way as well.

There is no doubting your theory knowledge and you clearly have a passion for music. It is a great shame that someone with such knowledge is choosing to leave.

I am sure that it is not your intention, but I can certainly see why some people would take objection to the manner in which you have written some of your posts. It can come across as though you do see yourself as better than anyone else and as Polyal recently suggested, a little more tact could be used at points. But that aside there is nothing wrong with being confident about your knowledge.

What I would really like is if you could stick around and perhaps reword things a little different and I am sure that we could all get along just fine. If you choose not to then I genuinely wish you the best of luck for the future and feel free to pop back if ever you decide.

Olly

527

(10 replies, posted in Recording / Studio)

This is really great - thanks a lot

528

(10 replies, posted in Recording / Studio)

Thanks for this.

One thing I am confused about is regarding clipping - I assume that running the limiter will stop this from happening but I assume that this has to be run at the same time as recording as there is no way to repair it after it has clipped? Is this correct?

With reverb and eq, is it not the case that once you have recorded you can then remove that reverb and/or eq or tweak it to how you want? ie isn't cubase only recording the clean sound anyway and then applying the effect to it after?

529

(8 replies, posted in Misc)

I am not much of a designer myself but I was thinking about trying to create a fresher design for this forum.

I personally like how clear and easy it is to read posts so I don't think I would change that but maybe the header could be changed.

What do you all think about it?

530

(9 replies, posted in Guitars)

Nope, there isn't anything I don't think. I love playing. I have dedicated so much of my life already to learning to play and I wouldn't give it up for any amount of money.

What would be your minimum?

531

(10 replies, posted in Recording / Studio)

Great - thanks for this. I think the limiter will help and also mic technique I can understand. I guess I just have to get more used to it.

Do you tend to use a dynamic or condenser for vocals? I am not too sure of the pros and cons of using either

532

(9 replies, posted in Guitars)

Blimey... I didn't realise my playing was so bad that you have to resort to bribery!!!! default/big_smile

533

(1 replies, posted in Announcements)

Eric  (GuitarTutorHelp) has kindly  offered a discount on his course

http://forums.ollysguitar.com/topic/105 … technique/

I have been fortunate enough to have been given access to the course and so far it is clear that a lot of thought and time and effort has gone into creating this.

I will be giving some parts of the course a go myself and when time permits I will update this thread with my progress.

534

(10 replies, posted in Recording / Studio)

I set up my condenser mic ready to record some vocals.

What I found is that the mic is so sensitive, it makes such a difference if you move even a fraction closer to it or further away so the recording isnot consistent in levels.

So I am assuming that I should be using a compressor as an input to smooth those levels?

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Cheers

535

(13 replies, posted in Introduce yourself)

Hi and welcome to the forum.

I have no idea on your question but I am sure someone here will help.

What music are you into?

Instructor - I do actually like your song. It sounds well written to me. How was this song first born? lyric melody or that nice rhythmic chord progression?

Have you written many more?

537

(8 replies, posted in Your Recordings)

Yes this link works for me - is this your soundclick page?

538

(10 replies, posted in Introduce yourself)

Talk about digging up an old thread! In fact the oldest thread!!!!

I agree with you Polyal regarding the art of songwriting itself though the points that Instructor makes can be valid for things like playing out of tune, hitting bum notes, poor timing or phrasing bad recording mixes which are all regarding the production of the song rather than the songwriting process.

Whilst good or bad songs are only good or bad in the mind of the listener, there is the point of a well written song and this is open to critique a little more.

Genuine opinions are good for the songwriter I think as well. Certainly if you have enough of them. If loads of people say your song is monotonous and lacks any kind of meaning or direction, sure, there may be one or two people that like that sort of thing, but if generally people don't for those reasons , and it is not your intention to create a monotonous, non meaningful directionless piece then this criticism could be valuable.

So Instructor I hope people do contribute to this thread. I am not a good critic as every song I have come to love I didn't like in the first instance but I will happily open my mind and join in. Maybe you could post some of your work?

540

(8 replies, posted in Your Recordings)

Doesn't seem to work from my end?

It's great John - I love the guitar solo in it as well!

542

(5 replies, posted in General Chat)

Instructor wrote:

I think Guitar hero opened up a lot of peoples eyes as to how fun playing guitar could be.

And also how good some of the guitar based songs are - I think it probably got a lot more people into guitar based music!

NicolaePaul wrote:

How much do you work on your ear training ?

I have started working on it a whole lot more, more recently.

I think it is something that I previously hadn't focused on as much as I should have done.

544

(4 replies, posted in Favorite Guitar Sites)

Instructor wrote:

A power chord is not a chord at all, but a double stop

What if you include the octave note and play three strings - I assume that you would still call this a power chord and it would still be a chord not a double stop?

Instructor wrote:

The 3rd degree of G# would not be a C.  It would be a B#.  Functionally this would be the 3rd, and any kind of C is considered a 4th.

It is correct to say this but also important to point out that B# is actually a C.  It comes down to the way that scales are labeled. So there is only ever one instance of each letter spelling the scale.

To sharp a note means that it is moved up one fret (semitone) to in this instance the B is moved up one semitone to the C. However, to 'spell' the scale correctly it is refereed to as B# as the next note is C#.

545

(143 replies, posted in Misc)

mikeyBoab wrote:

It's all good though. Am enjoying it but "tired" does not begin to describe how I'm feeling these days.

I know the feeling. I think last night was the first night that only one of them woke up one time. Usually I am woken many times throughout the night. Luckily mine do tend to settle quickly but with the interruption in sleep all the time it is no wonder I am so grumpy all the time!

546

(10 replies, posted in Your Recordings)

Polyal - thanks. I am going to see if I can find someone online that might like to work with me. It could be just the thing to get me started.

It would be good to hear one of your compositions sometime!

Instructor wrote:

Where are you ultimately trying to take your playing, as an individual guitarist, so that you arent categorized or pigeonholed as a JS sounding guy?

I really like Satch but I am not an instrumental player. If I could compose and play as well as Satch I would be happy but I don't think it is in me. I like songs. Sung songs - and this is where  I am trying to take my playing.

I would like to be able to compose music both on guitar and piano/keyboard that is interesting to listen to and combine that with interesting guitar work within the music.

Generally I don't think my playing sounds like Satch but there is no denying that this one does. I think it is the 5add9 chord that immediately makes me think of him!

547

(9 replies, posted in Music Theory)

don p wrote:

Let me ask you this. If you don't know your notes on the neck that how are you sure that the A minor at the 5th fret is actually an Am and not a Bm? Just because you have seen it done this way in books? I would guess that if I asked you to play a D on the E string you could find that right? Learning the rest of the notes on the neck is no more difficult then that.

I guess I would know if was right because I am familiar with other positions of Am and Am will sound the same whereever you play it.

I see your point though. I know I could play a D on the E string. I know I could play a D on any string, and using octaves etc I could do that pretty quickly though for me, I the only time I am thinking this way is when I am deliberately trying to locate notes. It is never something that I could use for general playing.

I can definitely see the advantages and this thread has inspired me to try and be more conscious of the notes that I am playing and try and get to that next level of understanding.

If I am playing any chord I know the root of the chord but I never have bothered to know what the other notes are within the chord. I could work it out by naming the notes on the strings using the above techniques based on the pattern or positioning I am playing, I could also working it out using my knowledge of theory but it is never there in my mind without thinking about it and therefore it becomes unusable for me.

I think the way I will proceed personally is, wherever possible I will try and name the notes of what I am playing and hopefully then it will become ingrained.

548

(31 replies, posted in Guitar Techniques)

Instructor wrote:

I need to practice and play standing up

I'm the same. I always played sitting down. When it came to standing up I lost all my speed and precision.

So it is certainly wise to practice both ways really.

GuitarTutorHelp wrote:

Practice Tip #2:
Work on playing FULL songs! Learning riffs and licks are great, but it's also important to play songs
from start to finish! Choose songs that you can tackle and write out an outline of all the parts. Or, get
the sheet music or learn by ear!

This is a good one. I used to just learn the intro or main riff and that was it. There is a skill for all parts of music and learning the whole song gives you a better understanding of composition as well as improving your rhythm and timing.

My tip for improving speed is use a metronome. You can download them for free now. using a small exercise or lick you are working on slow it down until you can play it perfectly. Then up the tempo by 2 - 5 bpms - can you still play it perfectly? If not, keep working on it until you can. Only move on when you have mastered the new tempo.

550

(9 replies, posted in Music Theory)

don p wrote:

One of the things is what happens when someone says play an Am,G,Dm and an Em for me. You don't want to be stuck to playing open chords.

Yes I can certainly understand this however not knowing the notes does not stop me from doing this. I tend to think in positions. So if I am playing an Am in open I know I have one at at 5th fret that I could use, and of course 12th fret. At no point am I thinking where is an A note, where is a C note and where is a E note and now lets combine them - I am using patterns and known positions as well as the name potentially the root note.

don p wrote:

Also is you are improvising in say E miinor in the first few frets of the neck and you want to jump up to the higher frets things can be a little easier if you know where the E notes are up there

Again, I find that this is achieved via positions and patterns. Personally if I were playing in E minor I would be basing any lead around the open position, 12th fret and 7th fret using the patterns that fall above and below that root note. I am not ever considering the names of the notes.

So are you thinking in a different way than I do Don?

Instructor wrote:

It really depends upon what you ultimately are after.

So for me, I like playing and I wish to compose more - how will knowing the notes benefit my playing/composing  do you think?